Date: 2004-10-03 11:18 am (UTC)
ext_85396: (Astronaut: space/future)
I think several of the main problems with NASA are:
-- it has become heavily politicized;
-- too much of what it does has been subjugated to the needs of military and intelligence programs, leaving little resources left over for doing basic science;
-- a series of administrators with no real vision or imagination (or worse, the ill-fated "better, faster, cheaper") have largely left NASA reduced to doing what's "safe".

To be fair, much of the fault lies with Congress, which has repeatedly cut NASA's budget to the bone. But on the whole, I don't think NASA has made effective use of what budget it has since the end of the Apollo program. There have been big successes, Hubble among them, but there have been few real advances, and the Shuttle has been a hugely expensive, slow-to-turn-around boondoggle that has never lived up to the promises made for it.

I'm hoping the civilian space program will turn at least some of that around by showing what can be done when the doers aren't fettered with bureaucracy and government mandates.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

vernard: (Default)
Vernard Martin

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
91011 12131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 10th, 2025 12:41 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios